‘They haven’t asked members’: Accountants’ exemption debate heats up

By September 19, 2019 Homepage, In the Media, Industry

Labor Accountants Daily Logo
Published by Accountants Daily, powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Written by Sarah Kendell on 18 September 2019

A software boss has voiced his frustration with the accountants’ exemption debate, arguing that two professional associations have failed to back members’ sentiments.

BGL managing director, Ron Lesh, told sister title, SMSF Adviser, that Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand and CPA Australia had been wrong in their submissions to Treasury that returning the exemption would not be enough to address unmet advice needs among SMSF trustees.

“What they should have done is said we support what’s being proposed and we would also like to see the following, but instead they have said we don’t support it at all,” Mr Lesh said.

“They haven’t asked members and that is what I see is the problem, ask any member in a small firm whether the exemption should come back and the answer would have been yes.

“It’s not going to solve the whole problem but it’s certainly an improvement on what we’ve got – you’ve got to start somewhere.”

Mr Lesh said the willingness of Treasury and regulators to consider a return of the exemption indicated an industry-wide acceptance that the current regime wasn’t functioning as it should, and that further steps should also be taken to improve quality and access to SMSF advice.

“Every time ASIC does its shadow shopping it finds SMSF advice is crap, and accountants agree it is not working,” he said.

“ASIC have not come out and jumped up and down and said [returning the exemption] is a bad idea, and they would have if they didn’t think it was, so their view is clearly that SMSF advice isn’t working.

“The way I look at it is the first stage is getting the exemption back and allowing accountants to talk about what they should be talking about, and once we’ve done that we need to get trustees better investment advice.”

Mr Lesh said in addition to reinstating the exemption, the SOA process needed an overhaul to make investment advice affordable and appealing for SMSF trustees, given that 80 per cent of self-managed funds currently did not use a financial planner.

“The research we’ve done about that is that the whole SOA process, having to produce a 40 page document and pay $3000 or $4000, is ridiculous – it should be a two page document,” he said.

“We have to come up with a short form SOA that can be used not just for SMSFs but generally.”

Mr Lesh added that rather than sitting under the ASIC licensing regime, the government should consider developing a separate SMSF adviser profession with its own training requirements, regulated by the TPB.

BGL is supporting a return of the accountants’ exemption through encouraging its users to sign a petition started by the Institute of Public Accountants, which Mr Lesh said now had around 1000 signatures.

SIGN THE PETITION http://bit.ly/2m0y5Vb

BGLCorp

Author BGLCorp

More posts by BGLCorp

Join the discussion One Comment

  • Ron is spot on with his comments. The current system is expensive, cumbersome, ineffective and a bureaucratic nightmare. Accountants should rally behind the cause and get back to simple, sensible, plain vanilla, good advice and help our clients. How did we end up here? What was wrong with the old Accountants’ Exemption anyway?? After all, we accountants were not the ones named and shamed at the Royal Commission. By and large it was those who were already license holders? Evidence enough that licensing on its own does not provide good outcomes.

Leave a Reply